Two representatives from the U.S. House of Representatives have sent a letter to Department of Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, asking that drone producer DJI stay on the Department of Commerce Entity List.
The full textual content of the letter is linked above. Jan Schakowsky, Chair of the Consumer Protection and Commerce Subcommittee, House Committee on Energy and Commerce; and Gus M. Bilirakis, Ranking Member of the Consumer Protection and Commerce Subcommittee on the House Energy and Commerce Committee wrote the letter, which asks U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo to maintain DJI on the division’s entity listing and examine the corporate’s pricing ways:
DJI deserves extra scrutiny by the Department of Commerce for its historical past of complicity with human rights abuses and its market ways. We ask that DJI stay on the Department’s Entity List and that the Department examine its pricing of client drones which has harmed American shoppers.
At the time the Department positioned DJI on the Department of Commerce Entity List – together with 76 different firms – DJI and different Chinese firms had been accused of taking part in human rights abuses, because it appeared that DJI drones had been used for surveillance by Chinese authorities businesses.
The present letter claims that DJI’s low pricing characterize unfair market ways.
… DJI was in a position to attain its monopoly via extraordinarily low pricing. Reports point out that DJI dropped its costs for client drones by as a lot as 70% in 2015. Since then, three of their largest rivals stopped manufacturing of client drones. The outcome has been a dramatic lack of home manufacturing functionality, based on an official from the Department of Defense.
These ways have harmed client selection whereas making DJI the default client drone supplier within the United States. We respectfully request that the Department of Commerce examine DJI’s pricing of its client drone merchandise and its profitable effort to drive rivals out of the market.
DJI denies the allegations about worth gouging, and a U.S. federal courtroom dominated that DJI’s U.S. gross sales practices had been truthful in 2019 throughout an anti-trust case. In a blog post clarifying some common misconceptions concerning the firm, DJI says:
DJI leads the drone trade as a result of we ship what clients need – probably the most modern know-how at aggressive costs. We had been the primary to develop many fashionable options, our design and manufacturing experience permits us to retool and introduce new merchandise rapidly, and we have now met the technical challenges of drone growth and manufacturing higher than our rivals.
Long-time market observers know that DJI has by no means bought the least costly drones out there, however as an alternative has supplied premium merchandise at affordable costs. A U.S. federal courtroom rejected allegations of unfair pricing final 12 months, ruling that DJI’s American gross sales practices have been “totally per strong competitors in a rising market.”
What DJI Inclusion on the Department of Commerce Entity List Means
Inclusion on the Entity listing doesn’t influence DJI’s skill to promote drones within the U.S. and isn’t a ban on the acquisition of DJI drones. The Entity listing is a part of the U.S. export management protocol, and will make it tougher for U.S. firms to export elements to DJI.
Miriam McNabb is the Editor-in-Chief of DRONELIFE and CEO of JobForDrones, an expert drone providers market, and a fascinated observer of the rising drone trade and the regulatory surroundings for drones. Miriam has penned over 3,000 articles centered on the business drone area and is a global speaker and acknowledged determine within the trade. Miriam has a level from the University of Chicago and over 20 years of expertise in excessive tech gross sales and advertising and marketing for brand spanking new applied sciences.
For drone trade consulting or writing, Email Miriam.
Subscribe to DroneLife here.